CourtFile pilots are scoped around matter volume, document volume, and retention needs. Most teams start with a guided pilot and expand once the workflow is proven.
Best for teams proving out a faster matter-review workflow on a smaller set of active matters.
For teams that review filings every week and need a repeatable handoff process across matters.
For larger deployments that need governance, procurement review, and tailored document workflows.
Filing upload, party extraction, deadline extraction, procedural timeline generation, claim and motion summaries, citation links, missing document flags, and an exportable matter brief.
CourtFile is built for litigation paralegals, associates, and litigation support teams who need to understand an active matter quickly and accurately.
Teams typically start with complaints, answers, motions, orders, docket sheets, notices, declarations, and supporting exhibits.
The output is an exportable matter brief with structured timelines, parties, claims, deadlines, source-linked summaries, and missing document flags.
Yes. BYOK support is available for teams that want model usage to run through their own provider accounts.
No. CourtFile does not train on customer matter data, filings, or generated summaries.
If your team is evaluating CourtFile around one specific workflow, start there first.
CourtFile helps litigation teams extract deadlines from court orders, notices, and motion papers into a verified list with source references.
CourtFile turns filing packets and dockets into a verified matter brief that litigation teams can review, share, and export.
CourtFile helps litigation teams review motion packets faster by extracting relief sought, arguments, dates, citations, and missing supporting materials.
CourtFile supports case handoffs by turning active matter filings into a structured, reviewable brief before an associate has to act on the case.